Political Quotes

Jim Sensenbrenner: I thank the gentlewoman from Washington for offering this amendment, and I support it. This amendment clarifies that…

On the recordMay 12, 2016
I thank the gentlewoman from Washington for offering this amendment, and I support it. This amendment clarifies that grant monies authorized by H.R. 5046 can be used to fund community-based substance abuse diversion programs sponsored by law enforcement agencies. There are a variety of programs across the country administered by State and local law enforcement and prosecuting agencies that offer diversion to drug treatment and other services as an alternative to incarceration. In my home State of Wisconsin, Treatment Alternatives and Diversion, or TAD, programs ``offer offenders the opportunity to enter and do voluntary substance abuse treatment, case management, and other risk reduction services as a safe alternative to jail or prison confinement. Diverting nonviolent offenders into substance abuse treatment keeps them out of jail and correctional facilities, thereby saving bed space and taxpayer dollars, as well as treating the underlying addiction that may have influenced the commission of a crime or may contribute to future criminal behavior.'' These are precisely the types of treatment alternatives to incarceration programs that I believe should be eligible for funding through this new Department of Justice grant. I thank the gentlewoman from Washington for working with us on drafting the amendment. I urge my colleagues to join me in support of it. I reserve the balance of my time. Ms. DelBENE. Mr.…
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin
Source
govinfo.gov
May 12, 2016

Share

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Jul 28, 2020

Conservatives are consumers too. And the way the net was put together, in the eyes of Congress, is that everybody should be able to speak their mind.

congress.gov
Sep 30, 2020

You know, I think that antitrust law has to continue to be focused on consumer welfare rather than deviating into other problem areas.

congress.gov
Feb 13, 2020

I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro…

govinfo.gov
Feb 13, 2020

I make the point of order that a two-thirds vote is required for passage of this joint resolution because it does have the effect of amending the Constitution. And on the point of order, Madam Speaker, there was an extension that was…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation