On the recordJuly 18, 2013
As I stated at the beginning of our first hearing, concern for this issue is bipartisan, and requires bipartisan perspectives.
Source
congress.govJim Sensenbrenner: “As I stated at the beginning of our first hearing, concern for this issue is bipartisan, and requires bipartisan…”
Editor's note · Context
Emphasizing the bipartisan nature of the issue at the hearing.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Dec 10, 2019
if you, on the other side of the aisle, believe that Joe Biden is a man who tells the truth, you ought to support this amendment
Mar 11, 2020
I am no stranger to this debate. In the aftermath of 9/11, I stood on this floor to advance the USA PATRIOT Act. I still believe, as I did at the time, in its necessity to protect our country from terrorist attacks. In 2015, after abuses…
Sep 29, 2020
I did not, and there is no system that I know of that provides artists with compensation when their work is used.
Feb 13, 2020
It is my intention to raise a point of order that this resolution requires a two-thirds vote. I will argue the point of order when it is made, but I need to know when the proper time is to raise the point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore…
Other voices in this conversation
