On the recordMarch 18, 2013
Let me say that to amend ECPA, we are going to need to have a balancing act, which means that neither law enforcement nor the service community are going to get everything they want.
Source
congress.govJim Sensenbrenner: “Let me say that to amend ECPA, we are going to need to have a balancing act, which means that neither law enforcement…”
Editor's note · Context
Sensenbrenner discusses the challenges of balancing privacy and law enforcement needs in amending ECPA.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Mar 11, 2020
I am no stranger to this debate. In the aftermath of 9/11, I stood on this floor to advance the USA PATRIOT Act. I still believe, as I did at the time, in its necessity to protect our country from terrorist attacks. In 2015, after abuses…
Feb 13, 2020
Parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Wisconsin will state his parliamentary inquiry.
Dec 10, 2019
But obstruction of Congress, when there is no referee, there is no adjudication, there is nothing but a majority that says, 'You give us what we want until we find a crime, or we are going to throw you out of office,' that is so…
Dec 10, 2019
I think it is very obvious that there was no treason or bribery alleged here.
Other voices in this conversation
