this hearing is on whether the President's action is constitutional.
Jim Sensenbrenner: “this hearing is on whether the President's action is constitutional.”
Editor's note · Context
Sensenbrenner emphasizes the hearing's focus on the constitutionality of the President's actions.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
It is my intention to raise a point of order that this resolution requires a two-thirds vote. I will argue the point of order when it is made, but I need to know when the proper time is to raise the point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore…
I remain skeptical of proposals that break up these companies, mandate a one-size-fits-all data standard, or create a government-run 'public option.'
I make the point of order that a two-thirds vote is required for passage of this joint resolution because it does have the effect of amending the Constitution. And on the point of order, Madam Speaker, there was an extension that was…





