Now, the criminal statute uses the word 'gross negligence.' And I can't for the life of me figure out what the difference between 'gross negligence' and 'extremely careless' is unless one really wants to parse some words.
Sensenbrenner questions the distinction between legal terms used in Clinton's case.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro…
I remain skeptical of proposals that break up these companies, mandate a one-size-fits-all data standard, or create a government-run 'public option.'
It is my intention to raise a point of order that this resolution requires a two-thirds vote. I will argue the point of order when it is made, but I need to know when the proper time is to raise the point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore…
Other voices in this conversation
