Now, the criminal statute uses the word 'gross negligence.' And I can't for the life of me figure out what the difference between 'gross negligence' and 'extremely careless' is unless one really wants to parse some words.
Sensenbrenner questions the distinction between legal terms used in Clinton's case.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Wouldn't that be up to somebody on the other side of the issue to say that this is not proven?
I have reached the conclusion that we do not need to change our antitrust laws. They have been working just fine.
Successful implementation of the mandate for competition in the antitrust laws encourages innovation, which is the main driver of economic growth.
Other voices in this conversation
