On the recordJuly 22, 2009
I think the message was given when the House voted down the Baird amendment by a vote of 63 yes to 353 no, that the House overwhelmingly opposed having appointed members, period.
Source
congress.govJim Sensenbrenner: “I think the message was given when the House voted down the Baird amendment by a vote of 63 yes to 353 no, that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Sensenbrenner highlights the House's rejection of the Baird amendment regarding appointed members.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Feb 13, 2020
I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro…
Dec 10, 2019
Now, let me say that everybody on both ends of the telephone call between President Trump and President Zelensky has said very clearly there was no quid pro quo offered.
Dec 10, 2019
I think that this markup has been a lot better than it could have been, and I think the chairman has been probably very evenhanded on that.
May 19, 2020
One of the few things that deans do around here, aside from using our institutional memory, is to ask unanimous consent that people who are elected in special elections from their State be permitted to take the oath of office. Today it is…
Other voices in this conversation
