This bill attempts to take a middle course. What is so wrong with 4 months? The provision in the omnibus appropriation bill which was signed by former President Clinton on December 21, 2000, established a period of 4 months and 10 days for 245(i) applications to be timely filed. A lot of people did not timely file their 245(i) applications because the Immigration and Naturalization Service waited until the middle of March in order to issue the regulations for the extension. That was not the fault of those who were eligible to apply; that was the fault of the Immigration Service, and I think most of us who have immigration cases in our own congressional office realize that this agency is probably more dysfunctional or nonfunctional than any of the other agencies of the Federal Government.
Jim Sensenbrenner: “This bill attempts to take a middle course. What is so wrong with 4 months? The provision in the omnibus appropriation…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the compromise bill related to immigration application deadlines.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
I've been in Congress 42 years. That's coming to an end at the end of this year. I'm breathing a sigh of relief.
You know, I think that antitrust law has to continue to be focused on consumer welfare rather than deviating into other problem areas.
Conservatives are consumers too. And the way the net was put together, in the eyes of Congress, is that everybody should be able to speak their mind.
I make the point of order that a two-thirds vote is required for passage of this joint resolution because it does have the effect of amending the Constitution. And on the point of order, Madam Speaker, there was an extension that was…





