What my Republican colleagues are not telling us about is the other half of the bill. Fifty percent of the cost of this bill goes to the people that were referred to before, Shad and his family from Illinois; and that is the part that all of us agree with. If the bill before us did that and solely did that, 435 Members of Congress would vote yes today; and the President would sign the bill this evening. What they fail to tell us about is the other half of the bill, which has nothing to do with marriage penalty. Mr. Speaker, understand that 50 percent of the benefits of this bill go to couples who do not pay a marriage penalty at all. So let's not call it a marriage penalty relief bill if they are getting it and they are not paying it. Call it a tax relief bill for the upper income, because if we look at the cost of the bill, almost 80 percent goes to the highest income wage earners in this country. I have no problem with them doing it that way, but then call it that and sell it that way.
Gerald Kleczka: “What my Republican colleagues are not telling us about is the other half of the bill. Fifty percent of the cost of this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill addressing the marriage penalty and tax relief during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Gerald Kleczka
I rise in disgust of yesterday's terrorist acts, and in strong support of the resolution before us. The cowardly acts of terrorism carried out yesterday against fellow Americans are sickening and unparalleled since the surprise attack on…
I back this resolution because of my complete support and admiration of the brave men and women in our armed services. Each of us owes a debt of gratitude to these selfless individuals who have put themselves in harm's way in service of…
first of all I would like to urge all my colleagues to give their unanimous approval to this legislation before us. I would like to thank and recognize the chairman of the committee, the gentleman from California (Mr. Thomas), for the…
This bill was before the Committee on Ways and Means a short time ago. And after listening to the debate, I come down on the same side as my colleague from Florida (Mrs. Thurman), who indicates that the long-term care insurance is…





