My point was not that this money is a small amount of money. My point was simply that a $4.3 million impact on a $600 million budget is infinitesimal in comparison to its effect on a budget which is only one-sixth that size. I would make the point that the amendment would provide less than $1 in additional help to every child my colleague is talking about, but it would provide a devastating cut in the ability to enforce protection for workers not in Washington, but in sweatshops in Los Angeles, in New York, and Chicago, in Wisconsin or any other State in the Union where workers are being taken advantage of every day.
David Obey: “My point was not that this money is a small amount of money. My point was simply that a $4.3 million impact on a $600…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of budget cuts on worker protections during a debate.
Share
More from David Obey
There is one difference between my friends over here who are speechifying against health care reform today and 50 million Americans. The difference is that the roughly 15 Americans over here all have health insurance, and it is largely…
I would simply say, Mr. Speaker, that the White House submitted this request for disaster relief over a month ago. Everyone in this institution has known about it; in addition to which, the gentleman's staff has known for a good 2 weeks…
I want to thank the Members on both sides of the aisle for their courtesies over the past 42 years, and I want to say that it has been a privilege for each and every one of us, whether we have served here one term or 21 or even more, it is…
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?





