my point was not that this money is a small amount of money. My point was simply that a $4.3 million impact on a $600 million budget is infinitesimal in comparison to its effect on a budget which is only one-sixth that size. I would make the point that the amendment would provide less than $1 in additional help to every child my colleague is talking about, but it would provide a devastating cut in the ability to enforce protection for workers not in Washington, but in sweatshops in Los Angeles, in New York, and Chicago, in Wisconsin or any other State in the Union where workers are being taken advantage of every day.
David Obey: “my point was not that this money is a small amount of money. My point was simply that a $4.3 million impact on a $600…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of budget cuts on worker protections during a debate.
Share
More from David Obey
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?
I have the highest respect and appreciation for our troops who have done everything asked of them, but they are being let down by the inability of the governments of Afghanistan and, in some instances, Pakistan to do their parts. I would…
Mr. Speaker, I would simply note that the gentleman is complaining because the committee is using precisely the same procedures that it used in the past when he was chairman and his party was in control of the situation. When Republicans…
He tells the truth fearlessly, and he is a patriot in every sense of the word. I will miss David's commitment, his dedication, and his integrity. And though soon no longer to be a colleague, he will always be my friend, and I think I know…





