Mr. Chairman, I certainly understand the motivation that leads the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn) to offer this amendment. It is ridiculous that this bill carries the $4.5 billion required to conduct the census as an emergency expenditure when the Constitution has told us since 1789 that we are going to have to be doing this every 10 years. I mean, I have heard of advance notice in my time, but I think that is about the longest. So I understand how ridiculous it is. That is why I asked the Committee on Rules to allow me to offer an amendment which would strike the emergency designation. We just heard a speech in the well saying that this is not an emergency and so this amendment should pass. The problem with this amendment is that it does not do what the debate would seem to indicate it does, because the amendment does not strike the emergency designation. It strikes the money to run the census. And that is an irresponsible thing to do. I do not, for the life of me, understand why we should take seriously the claim that this is an emergency.
David Obey: “Mr. Chairman, I certainly understand the motivation that leads the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Coburn) to offer this…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the emergency designation for funding the census during House floor discussion.
Share
More from David Obey
I would describe this bill as a fiscally responsible jobs bill. It is below the President's request by $1.3 billion, and below last year by one-half billion dollars. Last year, the Recovery Act demonstrated that investments in…
Let me simply say that our Republican friends are running true to form tonight. In the past 2 weeks, they have voted against funding unemployment insurance for people who have been laid off in the most excruciating recession in 70 years…
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?
And so the enemy is not external. Pogo said it, 'We met the enemy, and the enemy is us.'





