Mr. Speaker, despite the comments that have been made about highway funding levels, the language is clear. It indicates that the total obligations will be $27,700,000,000, instead of the $31.799 billion that were available in the previous fiscal year. That $27 billion level cannot be changed unless a subsequent appropriation bill passes to change it. So the fact is that this bill does single out highways for a reduction below last year, when almost no other program is asked to bear that kind of a reduction. That will result in 200,000 fewer construction jobs.
David Obey: “Mr. Speaker, despite the comments that have been made about highway funding levels, the language is clear. It indicates…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing highway funding levels and their impact on construction jobs.
Share
More from David Obey
I would simply say, Mr. Speaker, that the White House submitted this request for disaster relief over a month ago. Everyone in this institution has known about it; in addition to which, the gentleman's staff has known for a good 2 weeks…
This amendment was a Republican amendment offered by Mr. Cole from Oklahoma. It was not slipped in. It was voted in in the subcommittee appropriation bill 5 months ago.
I happen to agree with the gentleman from Virginia on the substance of the issue. But the fact is that the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee voted in open session with open debate to adopt the Cole amendment. Now, as chairman of the…
The way I see it, we're watching a let's pretend attack on the deficit tonight by singling out these items that cost about a million bucks. If Members are concerned about the deficit, I would ask, why did they vote for two tax cuts…





