let me simply note for observation by the gentleman from Kentucky that the Rules of the House allow Members, if the majority decides to proceed under an open rule and under the 5-minute rule, the Rules of the House allow Members to strike the last word any time they want in order to make their points. All the gentleman from New York (Mr. Serrano) is suggesting is that it makes more sense to have those remarks come in direct relationship to an amendment rather than having to strike the last word after the amendment has been disposed of. We did not put this bill together on the minority side, it is put together on the majority side, and it should not be surprising that those in the minority who have no opportunity to, in fact, change the content of the bill at least want an opportunity to explain their concerns about it, which is what the normal amendment process is supposed to be all about.
David Obey: “let me simply note for observation by the gentleman from Kentucky that the Rules of the House allow Members, if the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the amendment process and minority rights in the House during a floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
There is one difference between my friends over here who are speechifying against health care reform today and 50 million Americans. The difference is that the roughly 15 Americans over here all have health insurance, and it is largely…
41 years ago my friend and mentor, Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson, had a surprisingly simple idea. At the time, the country was fighting an unpopular and unwinnable war, and students were rising up in protest and holding teach-ins on…
I want to thank the Members on both sides of the aisle for their courtesies over the past 42 years, and I want to say that it has been a privilege for each and every one of us, whether we have served here one term or 21 or even more, it is…





