In light of the fact that you and the other sponsors of the amendment have worked to narrow the scope of the amendment to just the funds that are involved to operations in the United States, the committee would be happy to accept the amendment.
David Obey: “In light of the fact that you and the other sponsors of the amendment have worked to narrow the scope of the amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the acceptance of an amendment related to funding for operations in the U.S.
Share
More from David Obey
I think to give Khalid Sheikh Mohammed greater rights than we give an American man or woman who serves in the military is wrong.
I happen to agree with the gentleman from Virginia on the substance of the issue. But the fact is that the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee voted in open session with open debate to adopt the Cole amendment. Now, as chairman of the…
In a one-year experimental period, in the worst drug market in Nassau County, the level of drug arrests have been reduced by 80 percent.
This amendment was a Republican amendment offered by Mr. Cole from Oklahoma. It was not slipped in. It was voted in in the subcommittee appropriation bill 5 months ago.





