This gentleman is not sure what the right way to proceed is on that issue. This gentleman is sure that the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Rogers) was not elected to be Secretary of State and neither was the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) and for the Congress to, ahead of time, say that, regardless of what happens, only $500 million will be appropriated for peacekeeping is patently absurd. Why not telegraph to our enemies around the world ahead of time that once we hit the $500 million level, we ``ain't going to do nothing about anything?''
David Obey: “This gentleman is not sure what the right way to proceed is on that issue. This gentleman is sure that the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing appropriations for peacekeeping funding during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
This amendment was a Republican amendment offered by Mr. Cole from Oklahoma. It was not slipped in. It was voted in in the subcommittee appropriation bill 5 months ago.
I happen to agree with the gentleman from Virginia on the substance of the issue. But the fact is that the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee voted in open session with open debate to adopt the Cole amendment. Now, as chairman of the…
We are not adding one dime to the deficit by what we are adding to the summer jobs program. We are fully paying for it by cuts in other programs.
I want to thank the Members on both sides of the aisle for their courtesies over the past 42 years, and I want to say that it has been a privilege for each and every one of us, whether we have served here one term or 21 or even more, it is…





