I simply want to observe that there has been a false parallelism in this debate between the idea that if you are going to prevent drilling off the coast of Florida, then somehow it makes sense to prevent the construction of this pipeline. There is a big difference. The drilling has not occurred; the pipeline is already largely constructed. Secondly, there is no question that Florida is going to need the natural gas. So it seems to me that there is a false parallelism which should be dismissed by any neutral Members of the body. Secondly, let's not kid anybody: this amendment is not being offered because of the merits of the amendment. This amendment is here because it is payback time. There are some people in this place who are unhappy with the fact that last week this House said, 'No, we are going to protect the beaches of Florida.'
David Obey: “I simply want to observe that there has been a false parallelism in this debate between the idea that if you are going…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the debate over drilling off the coast of Florida and a related pipeline amendment.
Share
More from David Obey
Over 20 years, David Obey has become one of my dearest friends, my mentor, and, yes, we do conspire to try to do good things. He has shown me the power of this great institution and how it can change people's lives, to make opportunity…
In a one-year experimental period, in the worst drug market in Nassau County, the level of drug arrests have been reduced by 80 percent.
I have the highest respect and appreciation for our troops who have done everything asked of them, but they are being let down by the inability of the governments of Afghanistan and, in some instances, Pakistan to do their parts. I would…
As was pointed out earlier, those who suggest that any efforts to add any items to what is called a military supplemental are somehow out of line are simply wrong. This legislation started out as a disaster relief bill. It went to the…





