the comments just made by the gentleman in the well were absolutely, totally incorrect. I would point out that one of the objections we have to this permanent CR provision is that it would also allow for the continuation of programs at 100 percent of their previous level, even if this Congress has a bipartisan agreement that these programs have outlived their usefulness, that they are wasteful, that they are low priority, that they ought to be reduced so you have more room for other programs that we have reached consensus on that ought to be raised. So this amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with saving money. The only thing this amendment does is require the Congress to stop making tough choices. It requires the Congress to stop thinking. It puts Government on automatic pilot. It becomes the Bureaucracy Supremacy Act of 1987. It does not have diddly to do with saving one dime.
David Obey: “the comments just made by the gentleman in the well were absolutely, totally incorrect. I would point out that one of…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing objections to a permanent continuing resolution provision during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
I think to give Khalid Sheikh Mohammed greater rights than we give an American man or woman who serves in the military is wrong.
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?
Madam Speaker, after nearly 10 years, thousands of American troops killed or wounded, and hundreds of billions of dollars of borrowed money, I believe we must radically change our policy in Afghanistan. Of all the disturbing things in the…
In a one-year experimental period, in the worst drug market in Nassau County, the level of drug arrests have been reduced by 80 percent.





