I would like to ask the author of the amendment a question, please. Last night, I had thought that I was going to be supporting this amendment, but I have a question. The House adopted last night a human rights amendment which had a presidential waiver on the subject, which is important to us, but certainly is not absolutely essential to our own national security interests. It is my understanding now this morning that the gentleman's amendment does not have the authority for presidential waiver even if he believes that this would threaten national security or put U.S. troops in danger. Is that correct?
David Obey: “I would like to ask the author of the amendment a question, please. Last night, I had thought that I was going to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning an amendment related to human rights and national security during House debate.
Share
More from David Obey
Somehow we are being told that we are committing a mortal sin because we are trying to attach some material to the bill sent to us by the Senate. I would simply point out that just a few weeks ago, as the gentleman from Massachusetts…
And so the enemy is not external. Pogo said it, 'We met the enemy, and the enemy is us.'
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?
I would describe this bill as a fiscally responsible jobs bill. It is below the President's request by $1.3 billion, and below last year by one-half billion dollars. Last year, the Recovery Act demonstrated that investments in…





