I would just ask this of the gentleman from Washington. If it is true that his heart is so concerned about the plight of our Native Americans, then why did he not offer his amendment in committee when it would not be used as an effort to cut off the effort of the gentlewoman? And why did he then vote for a bill which cut Indian health services by over $500 million?
David Obey: “I would just ask this of the gentleman from Washington. If it is true that his heart is so concerned about the plight of…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning a colleague's commitment to Native American issues during a debate.
Share
More from David Obey
You don't get a second chance to educate kids. We should not fool ourselves into thinking that this package will do as much as we ought to be doing to ease the squeeze on the national economy. We will have partially offset with this bill…
But the truth of the matter is that I think we know better and that it does matter.
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 162, noes 260, not voting 11, as follows: [Roll No. 433] AYES--162…
Let me simply say that our Republican friends are running true to form tonight. In the past 2 weeks, they have voted against funding unemployment insurance for people who have been laid off in the most excruciating recession in 70 years…





