This amendment is simply an effort to reinstate the language as I understand the gentleman from Virginia wanted it, and to also insert the language originally inserted in this bill by the Committee on Appropriations which would prevent the agency from transferring certain funds that the committee had indicated should not be transferred. This is a simple effort on the part of one Member of the minority party to defend the institutional prerogatives of the Congress.
David Obey: “This amendment is simply an effort to reinstate the language as I understand the gentleman from Virginia wanted it, and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to appropriations and authorizing committee disputes.
Share
More from David Obey
He tells the truth fearlessly, and he is a patriot in every sense of the word. I will miss David's commitment, his dedication, and his integrity. And though soon no longer to be a colleague, he will always be my friend, and I think I know…
In a one-year experimental period, in the worst drug market in Nassau County, the level of drug arrests have been reduced by 80 percent.
I happen to agree with the gentleman from Virginia on the substance of the issue. But the fact is that the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee voted in open session with open debate to adopt the Cole amendment. Now, as chairman of the…
I loved Robert Byrd. For one thing, he and I shared a love of bluegrass music. I daresay he was the finest fiddler in the history of the Congress, but that's not the real reason that I hold him in such high esteem. He began as a product of…





