It seems to me nonetheless that the record obviously is not perfect. We had to accept many ``suggestions'' from the other body, for instance. So I think if this is going to go into effect, Members ought not to be allowed to assume that their own specific projects are beyond presidential reach. We ought to know in concrete terms just what is at risk. So I offer this amendment in that spirit and would hope that it would be accepted and adopted by this House.
David Obey: “It seems to me nonetheless that the record obviously is not perfect. We had to accept many ``suggestions'' from the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for clarity and acceptance of an amendment in legislative proceedings.
Share
More from David Obey
The way I see it, we're watching a let's pretend attack on the deficit tonight by singling out these items that cost about a million bucks. If Members are concerned about the deficit, I would ask, why did they vote for two tax cuts…
I would simply say, Mr. Speaker, that the White House submitted this request for disaster relief over a month ago. Everyone in this institution has known about it; in addition to which, the gentleman's staff has known for a good 2 weeks…
I happen to agree with the gentleman from Virginia on the substance of the issue. But the fact is that the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee voted in open session with open debate to adopt the Cole amendment. Now, as chairman of the…
I have the highest respect and appreciation for our troops who have done everything asked of them, but they are being let down by the inability of the governments of Afghanistan and, in some instances, Pakistan to do their parts. I would…





