I simply want to make certain that Members on both sides of the aisle understand that if they are interested in either party's position on the census question and on sampling, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to vote against this rule. The rule provides on a self-executing basis for the insertion of what will be considered the Republican preference on the issue. It also provides a straight opportunity for the gentleman from West Virginia [Mr. Mollohan] to offer an amendment which would in essence allow sampling to go forward, as is the Democratic preference. So, on either side of the aisle there is no reason to oppose this rule. Both sides have been accommodated fully.
David Obey: “I simply want to make certain that Members on both sides of the aisle understand that if they are interested in either…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the census question and sampling during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
Let me simply say that our Republican friends are running true to form tonight. In the past 2 weeks, they have voted against funding unemployment insurance for people who have been laid off in the most excruciating recession in 70 years…
Over 20 years, David Obey has become one of my dearest friends, my mentor, and, yes, we do conspire to try to do good things. He has shown me the power of this great institution and how it can change people's lives, to make opportunity…
I largely agree with my friend from Oklahoma. We have one simple dilemma: both in the case of the Cobell settlement and the Pigford settlement, the administration has asked us to provide the money. We do not yet have an understanding of…
He tells the truth fearlessly, and he is a patriot in every sense of the word. I will miss David's commitment, his dedication, and his integrity. And though soon no longer to be a colleague, he will always be my friend, and I think I know…





