Let me simply say the reason these amendments are in the self-executing rule is that we agree with you that under the circumstances they should not be in the bill. As I warned the House when we first started bringing appropriation bills to the floor, our committee did not have enough time to adequately get all of these amendments that were coming at us, and so we asked for a process which would allow us during the month of August to review all of them. In the end the House decided they did not want to do that. One of the major reasons is because Members of your party wanted to make certain that we had an opportunity to deal with them on the floor now. I warned at the time that meant that mistakes would be made. They were. When we caught the mistake, I went to the Rules Committee and Mr. Mollohan agreed that under the circumstances they ought to come out. We ought to be congratulated for it, rather than being questioned about it.
David Obey: “Let me simply say the reason these amendments are in the self-executing rule is that we agree with you that under the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inclusion of amendments in a self-executing rule during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
This is a very human institution, and it's affected very much by our personal relationships with one another. Very frankly, for the first 20 years that Jack and I served on the Appropriations Committee, we were often adversaries. There…
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?
Somehow we are being told that we are committing a mortal sin because we are trying to attach some material to the bill sent to us by the Senate. I would simply point out that just a few weeks ago, as the gentleman from Massachusetts…
We are not adding one dime to the deficit by what we are adding to the summer jobs program. We are fully paying for it by cuts in other programs.





