Last year, in order to pretend that the budget resolution provided adequate funding for education, the committee provided what was known as ``advance funding'' for education to the tune of $2.2 billion. That meant that, for Enron accounting purposes, that $2.2 billion, which was appropriated last year, was not going to count until the next fiscal year, 2004; but now, guess what. Now we are at the end of fiscal 2003. So nobody is watching what happens to the deficit for 2003 anymore. So what happens instead is that now we get a double reverse because this proposal, this resolution today contains a gimmick that can only be labeled ``Enron accounting 1A'' because what this resolution does now is to move that $2.2 billion back to fiscal 2003. So you have to play the shell game when they are looking at what happened in 2003, slip the money into the fiscal 2004 budget, and then when people take their eyes off 2003 and now focus on 2004, then you slip the same money into 2003. Great gimmick. It technically works, but if the SEC were supervising this, I think they would have the same kind of questions about our bookkeeping that we have had about Enron.
David Obey: “Last year, in order to pretend that the budget resolution provided adequate funding for education, the committee…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget resolution and accounting practices during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
He tells the truth fearlessly, and he is a patriot in every sense of the word. I will miss David's commitment, his dedication, and his integrity. And though soon no longer to be a colleague, he will always be my friend, and I think I know…
Why do you keep saying we're borrowing money to add to the summer youth program when this bill fully offsets every dime that we're spending on it?
I have the highest respect and appreciation for our troops who have done everything asked of them, but they are being let down by the inability of the governments of Afghanistan and, in some instances, Pakistan to do their parts. I would…
I think to give Khalid Sheikh Mohammed greater rights than we give an American man or woman who serves in the military is wrong.





