Mr. Chairman, I have told the House twice now that while I think this bill is an improvement over the budget presented by the President, in fact, it leaves this country seriously exposed to a whole variety of vulnerabilities from terrorist attacks. This bill attempts to try to close some of those gaps. This amendment would provide $1.4 billion more than the bill contains to address port transit and local first responder needs. It will provide a State formula grant increase of $350 million, urban area grant increase of $500 million, port security grant increase of $100 million, fire grant increase of $200 million, et cetera. I know that is a lot of money, but the fact is the Hart-Rudman Commission estimated there is a $90 billion need in order to protect our local communities, and so far we have only invested about $15 billion. We cannot buy that kind of security on the cheap. Secondly, this amendment would provide $550 million more to address aviation security. It would improve the cargo security situation. Right now, there is a huge percentage of cargo that is shipped on passenger airplanes that is not inspected for explosives. It would provide $333 million in additional funding for explosive detection systems at airports. It would increase funding for air marshals by $50 million because right now we are some 8 percent below where the President said we should be.
David Obey: “Mr. Chairman, I have told the House twice now that while I think this bill is an improvement over the budget presented…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for increased funding for security measures in response to vulnerabilities from terrorist attacks.
Share
More from David Obey
As was pointed out earlier, those who suggest that any efforts to add any items to what is called a military supplemental are somehow out of line are simply wrong. This legislation started out as a disaster relief bill. It went to the…
Mr. Speaker, I would simply note that the gentleman is complaining because the committee is using precisely the same procedures that it used in the past when he was chairman and his party was in control of the situation. When Republicans…
But the truth of the matter is that I think we know better and that it does matter.
This amendment was a Republican amendment offered by Mr. Cole from Oklahoma. It was not slipped in. It was voted in in the subcommittee appropriation bill 5 months ago.





