Mr. Chairman, on each of the last three appropriation bills, we were asked by the majority to agree to an overall time limit so that we could finish the bills on a reasonable time schedule, and we agreed on all three of those bills. Last night, at the close of business, at the direction of the minority leader, I went to the majority and indicated that we would appreciate it if at the beginning of business today, sometime between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m., that the majority would present to us a proposal for time limits on all amendments pending on the bill so that we could get some kind of time agreement so that Members would know where they were, and we could finish this bill at a reasonable time. We did not receive an offer until fairly late, as you can see, this evening. I asked the majority leader why it took so long before we could begin negotiations on this bill, and the response that I got was that sometimes bills have to ripen. I, frankly, think that this debate and this bill at this point is over ripe.
David Obey: “Mr. Chairman, on each of the last three appropriation bills, we were asked by the majority to agree to an overall time…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing time limits for amendments on appropriation bills during a committee meeting.
Share
More from David Obey
And so the enemy is not external. Pogo said it, 'We met the enemy, and the enemy is us.'
Let me simply say that our Republican friends are running true to form tonight. In the past 2 weeks, they have voted against funding unemployment insurance for people who have been laid off in the most excruciating recession in 70 years…
Mr. Speaker, I would simply note that the gentleman is complaining because the committee is using precisely the same procedures that it used in the past when he was chairman and his party was in control of the situation. When Republicans…
This amendment was a Republican amendment offered by Mr. Cole from Oklahoma. It was not slipped in. It was voted in in the subcommittee appropriation bill 5 months ago.





