I would simply say I would join both gentlemen in saying that some of these amendments I guess I would refer to as the ``anything you can do, I can do better'' amendments. It sometimes seems that no matter what the committee will do someone will want to move a dollar and a half around in order to make a political point. That is legitimate. Sometimes I do it. But I think we need to recognize it for what it is. There is no reason we ought to be robbing Peter to pay Paul. We ought to be funding both of these accounts adequately, and I would expect that by the time the bill works its way through the process, we will. I thank the gentleman for yielding.
David Obey: “I would simply say I would join both gentlemen in saying that some of these amendments I guess I would refer to as the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments and funding issues during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
I happen to agree with the gentleman from Virginia on the substance of the issue. But the fact is that the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee voted in open session with open debate to adopt the Cole amendment. Now, as chairman of the…
I think the gentleman from Florida has summed up the situation pretty well. In December, the House and Senate passed a 5-day continuing resolution in order to give the President time to sign the Defense appropriations bill. The President…
Mr. Speaker, I'm bringing a resolution to the floor that I have minimum high regard for, to say the least. America is facing serious problems, the most depressing is that we have the biggest divide between the haves and the have-nots since…
You don't get a second chance to educate kids. We should not fool ourselves into thinking that this package will do as much as we ought to be doing to ease the squeeze on the national economy. We will have partially offset with this bill…





