Mr. Chairman, if my colleagues wanted to make life more difficult for single mothers, for women trying to work their way through school, for women trying their hardest to scrape by for themselves and for their children, they could hardly do worse than the Labor Department's proposed rule to effectively repeal the 40 hour workweek and end overtime pay. The rule is designed to give flexibility to companies, not to families, but flexibility to withhold rightfully earned pay from their employees by weakening the 1938 Fair Standards Labor Act, protections that safeguard our workers' rights today and make mandatory overtime a less attractive option for the employer. For 70 years, overtime pay has been time and a half. It has kept the workweek for millions of Americans from becoming unmanageably long. It allowed the employee some flexibility to make some extra cash, and for anyone who relies on cash overtime pay, it is the only way to put a roof over their family's heads, to buy groceries and pay their medical bills. Without overtime, countless Americans would be forced to take a second job to make up for the lost earnings. It would mean more time away from their families and higher child care costs.
David Obey: “Mr. Chairman, if my colleagues wanted to make life more difficult for single mothers, for women trying to work their way…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Labor Department's proposed rule on overtime pay during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
I have the highest respect and appreciation for our troops who have done everything asked of them, but they are being let down by the inability of the governments of Afghanistan and, in some instances, Pakistan to do their parts. I would…
There is one difference between my friends over here who are speechifying against health care reform today and 50 million Americans. The difference is that the roughly 15 Americans over here all have health insurance, and it is largely…
Let me simply say that our Republican friends are running true to form tonight. In the past 2 weeks, they have voted against funding unemployment insurance for people who have been laid off in the most excruciating recession in 70 years…





