I would like to say that as much as I would like to support this bill, I cannot, for a number of reasons. First of all, the Committee on Rules, in the action of this House yesterday, made in order a totally illegitimate amendment to this bill by adding the 300-page housing bill and authorization bill. And I want to read my colleagues something that I just picked up on the press out of U.S. News today. It said that the legislation would raise the income levels of people eligible for public housing. The bill would give greater priority to people making as much as $40,000 to be admitted to public housing, allowing them to gain housing before lower-income families. Since no new public housing is being built, and existing waiting lists are years long, these lower-income families will have no option whatsoever. A total of 3 million low-income people would be denied access to public and federally assisted housing, including 1.8 million seniors and children. It went on to quote Secretary Cuomo, HUD Secretary Cuomo, as saying it is inexcusable that we would take the few units of affordable housing this Congress has allowed to remain and remove it from the grasp of the most vulnerable Americans. This means no housing for America's most vulnerable. I think that this Congress has no business attaching a proposal like that to this bill.
David Obey: “I would like to say that as much as I would like to support this bill, I cannot, for a number of reasons. First of all…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a housing bill amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Obey
This amendment was a Republican amendment offered by Mr. Cole from Oklahoma. It was not slipped in. It was voted in in the subcommittee appropriation bill 5 months ago.
41 years ago my friend and mentor, Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson, had a surprisingly simple idea. At the time, the country was fighting an unpopular and unwinnable war, and students were rising up in protest and holding teach-ins on…
You don't get a second chance to educate kids. We should not fool ourselves into thinking that this package will do as much as we ought to be doing to ease the squeeze on the national economy. We will have partially offset with this bill…
I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This will be a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 162, noes 260, not voting 11, as follows: [Roll No. 433] AYES--162…





