the issue is not whether there is going to be a tax cut. It is who going to get most of it. Under the Republican tax bill, you have the biggest transfer of wealth out of the pockets of low- and middle-income families to the most well-off families in this country that we have had since 1981. The Republican package does not contribute to long-term deficit reduction. It threatens it. The Democratic bill, by contrast, provides far more help to families who make less than $75,000 a year. It does not penalize working mothers who need child care because they are concerned about their children. It helps Main Street rather than Wall Street. I am not envious at all of the Republican package. I am appalled by the fact that it once again, as they have done continuously in this Congress, tried to use virtually every other piece of the tax package as a Trojan horse to drive through this place a giant bonanza for the wealthiest 100,000 or 200,000 tax-paying families in this country. That is wrong and the Democratic package tries to correct it.
David Obey: “the issue is not whether there is going to be a tax cut. It is who going to get most of it. Under the Republican tax…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of the Republican tax bill versus the Democratic alternative.
Share
More from David Obey
We are not adding one dime to the deficit by what we are adding to the summer jobs program. We are fully paying for it by cuts in other programs.
And so the enemy is not external. Pogo said it, 'We met the enemy, and the enemy is us.'
This is a very human institution, and it's affected very much by our personal relationships with one another. Very frankly, for the first 20 years that Jack and I served on the Appropriations Committee, we were often adversaries. There…
I loved Robert Byrd. For one thing, he and I shared a love of bluegrass music. I daresay he was the finest fiddler in the history of the Congress, but that's not the real reason that I hold him in such high esteem. He began as a product of…





