Mr. Chairman, again this bill is being offered as a bill which is trying to move the process forward and help resolve remaining differences between the White House and the Congress. I have already described why that is not so, but I have another example. I have just been handed a 5 page set of instructions which evidently the subcommittee chair for the Labor, Health and Education bill plans to insert in the Record, providing detailed instructions on how the money that is supposedly in this bill is supposed to be spent. We have never seen this until just a few moments ago. It makes some policy changes. It redirects funds and creates greater likelihood that they will go to some contractors rather than others. It just seems to me that if they are trying to minimize the differences between the White House and themselves on this issue, this is a mighty strange process to go through in that effort.
David Obey: “Mr. Chairman, again this bill is being offered as a bill which is trying to move the process forward and help resolve…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a bill related to Labor, Health, and Education funding.
Share
More from David Obey
Mr. Speaker, I would simply note that the gentleman is complaining because the committee is using precisely the same procedures that it used in the past when he was chairman and his party was in control of the situation. When Republicans…
I would simply say, Mr. Speaker, that the White House submitted this request for disaster relief over a month ago. Everyone in this institution has known about it; in addition to which, the gentleman's staff has known for a good 2 weeks…
I think to give Khalid Sheikh Mohammed greater rights than we give an American man or woman who serves in the military is wrong.
We are not adding one dime to the deficit by what we are adding to the summer jobs program. We are fully paying for it by cuts in other programs.





