Dismantling the U.S. sugar program will not save the Everglades. Sugarcane, the plant, is still the most benign crop grown in the Everglades agricultural area, requiring less water than rice, releasing fewer polluting nutrients than vegetables or cattle pastures. Studies show that the crops that might supplant sugarcane would pose a greater threat to the environment and, if the land became fallow, it would be quickly overtaken by melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. Reducing the price of sugar as the amendment would suggest will not create a consumer benefit. Reject this amendment. It is about jobs, as the gentleman from Florida said. It is about a bill that was fairly negotiated on this floor. They lost. They should accept their defeat. Protect the program. Defeat Miller-Schumer.
Thomas Foley: “Dismantling the U.S. sugar program will not save the Everglades. Sugarcane, the plant, is still the most benign crop…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of sugar policy on the environment and the economy during a floor debate.
Share
More from Thomas Foley
I just want to comment about what I saw, that I hope and I do believe Washingtonians and Americans understand, and that was his commitment to civility and a constitutional democracy.
A full life is not just about what you do with your years on this Earth, but about how you make people feel long after you've left it.
People do not need to change, systems do, and with your help today, we can begin to change those systems and increase economic opportunity for all people with disabilities.
I don't think you can point to another leader that we have been blessed with in our Nation's history that combines such a strong heart for his people with such a strong backbone for constitutional democracy.





