Last Thursday at the end of the dramatic vote on the balanced budget amendment and its rejection by a single vote, there were many who felt that this was a tragedy with respect to dealing with the problems facing the United States and its huge budget deficits now and during the course of this year. While I was a strong supporter of that amendment, and while I hope that the majority leader is able to bring it back up for another and more successful vote sometime in future, I believe that its rejection not only did not reduce the pressure on Members of the U.S. Senate, House of Representatives or the President of the United States to work toward a balanced budget, but I believe that in fact it increased that pressure.
T. Gorton: “Last Thursday at the end of the dramatic vote on the balanced budget amendment and its rejection by a single vote, there…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the rejection of the balanced budget amendment and its implications for U.S. budget policy.
Share
More from T. Gorton
In response to my colleague, the senior Senator from Nevada, let me say that your understanding of the issues affecting Lake Tahoe is correct. Your concerns seem reasonable, as does your interpretation of the language in question.
As I have said before, I greatly admire the Senator from Maine's tenacity and her unfailing devotion to the best interests of her State.
I would agree that maintaining dual suppliers of high performance, environmentally acceptable fire retardants is critical to the mission of the Service.
I thank my friend, and emphasize that we did not act again this year just to ratify the actions of the Department of Interior. The Committee to reemphasize its original intent: That Interior study the NRC report carefully, and that any…





