the effect of the Robb amendment would be to terminate all harvests on all public lands in the United States and much recreational activity that requires any kind of improvement. It requires between $5 billion and $9 billion worth of wildlife surveys beyond endangered species, surveys that are unnecessary and so expensive that it will not be wise to go ahead with any of them. The amendment does not require the Forest Service or the Secretary of the Interior to do anything. It simply authorizes them to conduct their business in the future as they have conducted it in the past. If they do not want to, if they want to go after these surveys, they still can. Section 329 is entirely discretionary and is entirely within the power of the administration to interpret as it wills.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Robb amendment on public lands and wildlife surveys.
Share
More from T. Gorton
The spectacle of the ``Battle in Seattle'' that most of us saw on the evening news also did not accurately represent the full experience that law enforcement officers on the street endured. These officers suffered through appalling work…
Americans have acquired far greater choice today after the implementation of those fuel efficiency standards than they had previously. The interesting part of the ad, which was just handed to me--I had not previously seen it--says: Say yes…
This last large package includes a Gorton-Levin-DeWine amendment with respect to Great Lakes fish and wildlife restoration and spartina grass research; one by Senator Cochran and others with respect to the National Endowment for the…
this is another example of Members of the Senate attempting to say they know much more about a particular business than do the people who run that business and depend upon customer satisfaction in order to run it profitably. Fortunately…





