Well, it does, but in that case, in that situation, it does not differ from the general philosophy of the present law either applied to races for Congress or to the Presidency. The thrust of my criticism was that 20 years ago, we went into this restriction of free speech rights with all of the same criticisms of the then system that we have now, that that law was going to restore confidence on the part of the American people in the system, and it is worse now and so their cure is more of the hair of the dog that bit you.
T. Gorton: “Well, it does, but in that case, in that situation, it does not differ from the general philosophy of the present law…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of campaign finance laws on free speech rights.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I would agree that maintaining dual suppliers of high performance, environmentally acceptable fire retardants is critical to the mission of the Service.
As I have said before, I greatly admire the Senator from Maine's tenacity and her unfailing devotion to the best interests of her State.
I thank my friend, and emphasize that we did not act again this year just to ratify the actions of the Department of Interior. The Committee to reemphasize its original intent: That Interior study the NRC report carefully, and that any…
I would agree that the U.S. Forest Service should preserve the option to use such fire retardants in order to minimize the long-term visual impacts of wildfires.





