There is a bill we will be discussing later this year called McCain-Feingold, which seeks, in this Senator's judgment, to essentially shut down legislative-advocacy-type independent expressions and to make almost impossible the ability of outside groups to engage in independent expenditures. My question to my friend from Washington is, given the fact that we have bills that go that far now, given this authority under this constitutional amendment to set 'reasonable limits,' is it not possible that Congress might decide such expenditures should be shut down entirely, that there is nothing reasonable about them, and that those voices should be quieted altogether?
T. Gorton: “There is a bill we will be discussing later this year called McCain-Feingold, which seeks, in this Senator's judgment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the McCain-Feingold bill on independent expenditures.
Share
More from T. Gorton
As I have said before, I greatly admire the Senator from Maine's tenacity and her unfailing devotion to the best interests of her State.
I expect that the $2.5 million grant program administered by NFWF will leverage at least $2.5 million overall in additional, nonfederal funds.
My home state, too, has experienced the disruption that a federal endangered species listing can cause. I therefore appreciate the importance and urgency of the funds sought by the Senator from Maine.
I would agree that the U.S. Forest Service should preserve the option to use such fire retardants in order to minimize the long-term visual impacts of wildfires.





