I want to read portions of a proposed regulation found on page 173 of the January 3, 2000, issue of the Federal Register: ``[I]t is important that individuals alter their daily behaviors,'' ``and for governmental entities to seek programmatic incentives, public education, regulatory changes, or other approaches.'' ``Daily behaviors'' are further defined as ``Individual decisions about energy consumption for heating, travel, and other purposes;'' and ``individual maintenance of residences or gardens.'' Those passages come directly from a ``4(d)'' Endangered Species Act regulation for the Pacific Northwest proposed by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The rule states flatly these are examples of activities that could kill salmon or steelhead through water, air, and ocean pollution, and that NMFS ``might or might not'' seek to regulate them as such under the rule. Taken literally, if these rules are enacted as written, National Marine Fisheries Service could regulate how often individuals drive their cars, where and how property owners could plant or fertilize their lawns, gardens, or farm crops. They could dictate the content of county zoning, public works, building, and road ordinances, and possibly even suggest limits on the setting of thermostats in homes or public school classrooms, or the operation of public transit buses--all to protect salmon.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing proposed regulations by the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding individual behaviors affecting salmon.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I concur with this observation about the poor BIA oversight and management of locally operated TPA programs. The BIA has not been able to tell the Senate just how these funds are spent by tribal governments. Other than broad categories…
I believe there are many improvements necessary, but my own experience, in literally dozens of schools over the last 2 or 3 years, has shown a tremendous dedication to better teaching methods, to the education of our children, to…
I am aware of these efforts and would encourage the National Park Service to work closely with the native corporation to further develop this proposal in light of the fact that they use private dollars to maximize public resources. Visitor…
this is another example of Members of the Senate attempting to say they know much more about a particular business than do the people who run that business and depend upon customer satisfaction in order to run it profitably. Fortunately…





