In general terms, we face the proposition that divides this body, I believe at this point, simply into two camps. There are those who, like myself, believe that the country is in a serious crisis, that the status quo is unsatisfactory, and that the situation, the set of rules under which we have operated-- not just for years but for generations--will not and cannot serve to lead this country along the road to fiscal sanity and a balanced budget and that, therefore, drastic action in the form of a constitutional amendment is necessary.
T. Gorton: “In general terms, we face the proposition that divides this body, I believe at this point, simply into two camps. There…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a constitutional amendment for a balanced budget.
Share
More from T. Gorton
The Senator is correct. Section 156 states, ``nothing in this section shall be construed to expand the existing statutory authority of the Secretary.'' The interpretation suggested by our House colleagues would require additional statutory…
In response to my colleague, the senior Senator from Nevada, let me say that your understanding of the issues affecting Lake Tahoe is correct. Your concerns seem reasonable, as does your interpretation of the language in question.
I thank my friend, and emphasize that we did not act again this year just to ratify the actions of the Department of Interior. The Committee to reemphasize its original intent: That Interior study the NRC report carefully, and that any…
I agree with his statement that the Committee intends for Interior to study the entire NRC report carefully and to adopt a rule that is consistent with the findings and recommendations of that report.





