I respond to the distinguished Senator that the amounts that will come out of each of the functions across the board under the alternative proposal of the Senator from Washington will be directly proportional to the amount in the allowance section, the small print, in the budget directed toward the purchase of furnishings for various Federal Government agencies. That, of course, is precisely specific, no more or no less specific than the amendment of the Senator from Iowa, which comes out of national defense. Of course, it would come out of any function of national defense, I suppose, if some of these agencies ended up preferring their own personal comforts for the work which they were designed to do that they might buy their plush furnishings in any event and shortchange their own activities. It is not the intent of the Senator from Washington-- the intent of the Senator from Washington is identical to that of the Senator from New Mexico, who had a similar but broader amendment during the course of the debate over the budget resolution in the Budget Committee itself. In any event, it comes out of the allowances section, and the precise intent will be to reduce by 50 percent the amount of money all Federal agencies spend on furniture and furnishings.
T. Gorton: “I respond to the distinguished Senator that the amounts that will come out of each of the functions across the board…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget proposals related to federal spending on furnishings during a Senate debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I have been pleased to support your efforts to commemorate the Saint Croix Island settlement, including your work on the Downeast Heritage Center. I would note that the National Park Service is scheduled to undertake major improvements to…
it has taken a considerable period of time to reach the happy conclusion of the debate over the appropriations bill for the Department of Agriculture. None of that delay is due to the distinguished chairman or to his ranking member, the…
At the very top of my list is pipeline safety. More than a year ago, a tragic accident in Bellingham, WA, occurred with a liquid pipeline. A huge explosion snuffed out the lives of three bright young people and destroyed a magnificent and…
I believe I speak for the Senator from Arizona as well as for myself in saying this merger seems quite obviously to be beneficial both to United Airlines and to U.S. Airways. Public policy, however, does not concern itself primarily with…





