Within the programs authorized in S. 1994, the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill, are allocations for noise mitigation. Under the Airport Improvement Program [AIP], the Federal Aviation Administration [FAA] has allocated funds to airports of all sizes to implement noise mitigation programs. Due to lower funding levels of the AIP, the FAA has recently implemented a rule that limits an airport to $8 million maximum for Federal noise mitigation funds--$5 million a year for single family housing and $3 million a year for all other uses. Mr. President, while this type of new cap may be appropriate in certain circumstances, I believe that a single cap, regardless of an airport interests or needs, is inappropriate for two reasons. First, in evaluating existing noise programs around the country, I think it is evident that certain airports have made noise mitigation a top priority. Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, for example, has been the national leader and was the first to implement the local housing insulation program to reduce noise impacts in houses surrounding the airport.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing noise mitigation funding in the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I am aware. ARCO, which is well known in Alaska, recently constructed and started a 70 barrel per day Gas-to-Liquids plant in Blaine, Washington, near Bellingham. ARCO did this with its own money and that of Syntroleum. With industry…
this is another example of Members of the Senate attempting to say they know much more about a particular business than do the people who run that business and depend upon customer satisfaction in order to run it profitably. Fortunately…
it was just last week that I came to the floor of the Senate to share a legal brief outlining the weakness of the Department of Justice's case against Microsoft. But I repeated at that time a thought I have expressed several times on the…
Initially--that amount was subject to a 0.48 percent across-the-board reduction; consequently, the House-passed funding level is $24.282 million, or $377,000 more than what the Senate Committee on Appropriations reported.





