as we proceed toward the climax of the debate on product liability and a vote on the bill at noon, I believe it appropriate to state what I think the issues in this debate truly are. The question involved in whether or not we wish to reform the product liability litigation system of this country has, I think, primarily to do with the products that are available to the American people, the rapidity with which new products are researched, developed, introduced, and marketed, and the cost of those products to the people of the United States. In each of these cases, the closely related question, of course, is the system of justice by which people who believe that they have been wronged get a determination as to whether or not such a wrong has been committed and how much compensation should be granted when a wrong is determined. Our present legal system serves well neither of these goals.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the issues surrounding product liability reform during a debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I was glad to see this pilot program recommended in the TPA report I have recently received from the BIA. We required this report in last year's appropriations bill. I have also noted that Nambe Pueblo has gone through a long process of…
Leaving this place, he is now on his way to Seattle, my home State, in pursuance of the Democratic nomination for the Presidency. On a number of occasions during the course of the last year when the Vice President has graced us with his…
I am aware. ARCO, which is well known in Alaska, recently constructed and started a 70 barrel per day Gas-to-Liquids plant in Blaine, Washington, near Bellingham. ARCO did this with its own money and that of Syntroleum. With industry…
I rise to support the energy and water development appropriations conference report. Within this bill is funding for a critical effort that is essential to the long-term future for citizens of the Northwest: the cleanup and restoration of…





