Each of us agrees on the vital importance of Byrne grants to effective law enforcement and particularly to effective drug interdiction in the United States. The Senator from Iowa proposes that it be taken out of antiballistic missile defense. This Senator proposes that it be taken out of all functions proportionate to the amount of money that they spend on furniture and on furnishings which, of course, will include a very small amount from the defense function itself. So the basic debate in which we are engaged at the present time is whether or not we want to restore this money for a vitally effective law enforcement function out of national defense or out of furnishings. I think it is a very simple proposition.
T. Gorton: “Each of us agrees on the vital importance of Byrne grants to effective law enforcement and particularly to effective…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding of Byrne grants for law enforcement during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I agree with that view. It should be the U.S. Forest Service's priority to use the most effective, environmentally protective aerially applied fire retardants.
I thank my friend, and emphasize that we did not act again this year just to ratify the actions of the Department of Interior. The Committee to reemphasize its original intent: That Interior study the NRC report carefully, and that any…
Washington state's rural communities have also benefited by the National Rural Development Partnership, particularly those regions that have been forced from their natural resource-based economies. For the sake of those who have come to…
As I have said before, I greatly admire the Senator from Maine's tenacity and her unfailing devotion to the best interests of her State.





