The answer to the question of the Senator from North Dakota is that in such States, such States are subject to the restrictions of this bill, exactly as they were under the intention of the bill as it was originally passed by the Senate Commerce Committee and by the Senate itself, as is evidenced by the Senate committee report, and that the change in the statutory language was simply to conform the statutory language with the intention expressed in the committee report.
T. Gorton: “The answer to the question of the Senator from North Dakota is that in such States, such States are subject to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on certain states during Senate debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
As I have said before, I greatly admire the Senator from Maine's tenacity and her unfailing devotion to the best interests of her State.
Washington state's rural communities have also benefited by the National Rural Development Partnership, particularly those regions that have been forced from their natural resource-based economies. For the sake of those who have come to…
My home state, too, has experienced the disruption that a federal endangered species listing can cause. I therefore appreciate the importance and urgency of the funds sought by the Senator from Maine.
I agree with his statement that the Committee intends for Interior to study the entire NRC report carefully and to adopt a rule that is consistent with the findings and recommendations of that report.





