No, I do not believe under any circumstances that it is. There is an absolute prohibition against so much as mentioning the name of a candidate in a 60-day period before an election in this bill. I simply refer the Senator to the first amendment. If that is not a law abridging the freedom of speech, we could not pass a law abridging the freedom of speech. Any other limitation or restriction would be valid. It flies directly into the teeth of the plain meaning of the first amendment.
T. Gorton: “No, I do not believe under any circumstances that it is. There is an absolute prohibition against so much as mentioning…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on free speech rights before elections.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I urge you to send me the Senate legislation to let wholesalers and pharmacists bring affordable prescription drugs to the neighborhoods where our seniors live. That proposal was passed by the Senate a couple of months ago as an amendment…
As I have said before, I greatly admire the Senator from Maine's tenacity and her unfailing devotion to the best interests of her State.
Unlike inspections conducted on overland sections of pipeline, the inspector would need specialized knowledge to properly determine the structural integrity and soundness of, say, a cable suspension bridge, in addition to that of the…
It is vitally important to memorialize such a friend. Every Monday evening or Tuesday morning, Paul Coverdell and I sat at the end of the table during leadership meetings in the majority leader's office, with an opportunity to comment on…





