Yes; one of the goals of this bill is to reduce transaction costs. It is to see to it that more of the money that goes into the legal system goes to actual victims, whether product liability as the bill is now more inclusive, medical malpractice. We find it an absolute scandal that for every dollar that goes into the product liability system only 40 cents or so gets to victims. And 60 cents goes to transaction costs, most of which goes to lawyers. We have not separated out how much of those lawyer fees are defendants' fees. That is a matter I suspect of indifference to the victim. It is 60 percent. Of course, for most insurance policies there is no limit on the amount that the insurance company will spend in defending the defendant in such a case. There hardly could be. Under those circumstances the claimant's attorney would simply drive the engine until that level had been reached and then no longer would have any opposition.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the goals of a bill aimed at reducing transaction costs in the legal system.
Share
More from T. Gorton
it is remarkable how a relatively short amendment and even debate can be misconstrued. The amendment we have before us that will be voted on in about 30 minutes is less than 10 full lines long. Twice, the senior Senator from Massachusetts…
I appreciate the Senators' comments. The Committee shares your view that the protection of the loggerhead sea turtle is critical, and we will consider the needs of the Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuge during our conference with the…
Initially--that amount was subject to a 0.48 percent across-the-board reduction; consequently, the House-passed funding level is $24.282 million, or $377,000 more than what the Senate Committee on Appropriations reported.
In Committee on the Senate side, we were able to boost funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services by $500,000, from its fiscal year 1999 level of $23.405 million, to $23.905 million for fiscal year 2000. And now we have…





