Congress, if this should be part of the Constitution, might well make just such a decision on the relatively rational grounds that all political speech they want to be directly attributable to candidates and not to permit anyone to engage in a partisan political debate except through the candidate's committees. Now, I must say to my friend from Kentucky, I doubt that would happen in the Congress immediately after the adoption of a constitutional amendment like this. The sponsors of this constitutional amendment are all supporters of the McCain-Feingold proposal, and my inclination is that they would be content with the passage of that legislation with this constitutional provision in effect. They know, or at least the most thoughtful and principled of them know, that McCain-Feingold is blatantly unconstitutional under the first amendment as the first amendment exists today. I rather imagine they would be satisfied with this reform as their predecessors were satisfied with the 1974 reforms. As soon as this reform showed itself to be as ineffective as 1974 has, as soon as it had pushed communication into another channel, they would be back to close off that channel.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed constitutional amendment related to political speech.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I want to express my ardent support for passage of the Iran Nonproliferation Act. It is very likely that this legislation will pass the Senate by a margin matching or nearing the unanimous 419 to 0 vote in the House of Representatives last…
I asked in the letter that the Vice President, in his exalted position in this administration, do his very best to see to it that the State Department ends this arbitrary action and promptly reimburses the region with that entire $5…
I regret to say the Senator from Massachusetts, obviously, has not read my amendment when he stated it allows 15 percent to be used for administration and not go to teachers. In fact, the distribution formula under the Gorton amendment is…
this is an amendment that has been widely discussed relating to CAFE standards; that is to say, the fuel efficiency standards of automobiles and small trucks sold in the United States. Now, I want to quote an argument against this proposal…





