There are simply no cases on the issue of whether the Congress could in effect federalize the two national parties; what McCain-Feingold seeks to do. Soft money by definition means non-Federal money. Our two great national parties get involved in Governors' races, county commissioners' races, legislators' races, and so on. This bill seeks to basically turn them into Federal parties, and take away their ability to participate outside the Federal system. There simply aren't any cases on that point because nobody has ever thought that was a good idea before. Even if maybe some court would rule that you could do it, it is not a desirable result.
T. Gorton: “There are simply no cases on the issue of whether the Congress could in effect federalize the two national parties; what…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the McCain-Feingold bill on national parties.
Share
More from T. Gorton
In response to my colleague, the senior Senator from Nevada, let me say that your understanding of the issues affecting Lake Tahoe is correct. Your concerns seem reasonable, as does your interpretation of the language in question.
I expect that the $2.5 million grant program administered by NFWF will leverage at least $2.5 million overall in additional, nonfederal funds.
Washington state's rural communities have also benefited by the National Rural Development Partnership, particularly those regions that have been forced from their natural resource-based economies. For the sake of those who have come to…
I agree with that view. It should be the U.S. Forest Service's priority to use the most effective, environmentally protective aerially applied fire retardants.





