Exactly the same logic that applies to the entire bill. If the utility manufactured a toaster, which is clearly a product, and gave it as a bonus to its customers, that product would be subject to this bill. The whole logic of the bill is to provide a degree of predictability to the law from State to State, which does not exist at the present time. That logic is every bit as applicable to a utility as it is to General Motors or to a small business that is engaged in retail sales.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to product liability and predictability in law.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I was glad to see this pilot program recommended in the TPA report I have recently received from the BIA. We required this report in last year's appropriations bill. I have also noted that Nambe Pueblo has gone through a long process of…
The rural counties should also seek the expertise of Utah State University and the State of Utah and rely on their personnel to complete this mapping project.
In effect, this bill would outlaw a number of engine lines and car models, including most full-size sedans and station wagons. It would restrict the industry to producing subcompact sized cars, or even smaller ones. That was a statement by…
I wish to say to my good friend from Utah that I agree that draining Lake Powell is not a reasonable proposal, and I support his effort to put the issue to rest with this amendment. However, I would like to ask my colleague from Utah if he…





