Mr. President, I find myself in a somewhat paradoxical situation. With almost all of the remarks and policy positions presented by the Senator from Tennessee, I find myself in agreement. Yesterday, for example, I voted with him against a limit on noneconomic damages in the medical malpractice portions of this bill, at least in part for the very kind of reasons that he outlined. I also found most forceful and persuasive--having used it myself--his arguments that the strongest case for congressional legislation in this field rests in the field of product liability, because we deal, almost without exception, with products manufactured in one State, sold in interstate commerce in a national market. I lost him, however, on the last turn--that that very forceful argument for greater uniformity in the rules under which product liability litigation was conducted therefore meant that we should apply this bill only to litigation conducted in Federal courts, whether it be product liability or presumably other forms of litigation which have now been adopted as a part of this bill.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing product liability legislation and its implications during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
the Endangered Species Act listing of various runs of salmon throughout the Northwest has been a wake-up call for Washingtonians. We have seen an unprecedented decline in a historically vibrant salmon population, relied upon by countless…
in fiscal year 1990, the Forest Service sold 11 billion board feet of timber for harvest and for productive use. For the last 2 years, we have authorized through our appropriations 3.6 billion board feet of harvest. The administration…
This last large package includes a Gorton-Levin-DeWine amendment with respect to Great Lakes fish and wildlife restoration and spartina grass research; one by Senator Cochran and others with respect to the National Endowment for the…
In Committee on the Senate side, we were able to boost funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services by $500,000, from its fiscal year 1999 level of $23.405 million, to $23.905 million for fiscal year 2000. And now we have…





