The intent of the conference committee drafters was to see to it that subsection (i) and subsection (ii) read the same way, because we had already described them as having the same meaning in the original Senate bill. There was an inconsistency. There they were described in the Senate bill, conference report, as having exactly the same meaning. So there is a change only to the extent that something was already gone with respect to tissue, organs, and blood.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the intent behind the conference committee's drafting of a bill.
Share
More from T. Gorton
it is often said, I think accurately, that what differentiates human beings from most other animals, most other mammals, is the extraordinary ability of human beings to learn from experience. Yet on the floor of the Senate this afternoon…
The Senator from Nevada is as learned as he is wise, and his reference to Luddites in the late 18th and early 19th century England is entirely correct. The word has come down to us today, referring to those who are so fearful of changes in…
the Endangered Species Act listing of various runs of salmon throughout the Northwest has been a wake-up call for Washingtonians. We have seen an unprecedented decline in a historically vibrant salmon population, relied upon by countless…
I was about to say, for the benefit of my friend from Nevada, isn't it fortunate that the Congress of the United States, in the first decade of the 19th century, didn't prohibit the development of a steam engine because it might explode…





