Under the same circumstances that it would provide it for any other similarly situated organization, providing product liability provides it for any manufacturer, or for that matter, distributor, no matter how large or how small. The direction of the bill, the direction of a product liability bill is to provide a degree of predictability and a protection of the consumer interest for the producers of goods--not services in this case--goods. If this is the description that a State uses for its utilities, yes, the committee did intend to provide exactly that protection, and that is exactly what the committee report says.
T. Gorton: “Under the same circumstances that it would provide it for any other similarly situated organization, providing product…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the intent of a product liability bill during a floor debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I expect that the $2.5 million grant program administered by NFWF will leverage at least $2.5 million overall in additional, nonfederal funds.
I agree with his statement that the Committee intends for Interior to study the entire NRC report carefully and to adopt a rule that is consistent with the findings and recommendations of that report.
I agree with that view. It should be the U.S. Forest Service's priority to use the most effective, environmentally protective aerially applied fire retardants.
This bill includes appropriations from the Historic Preservation Fund that could be used for eligible projects such as that for the Great Falls in Paterson.





