Under the same circumstances that it would provide it for any other similarly situated organization, providing product liability provides it for any manufacturer, or for that matter, distributor, no matter how large or how small. The direction of the bill, the direction of a product liability bill is to provide a degree of predictability and a protection of the consumer interest for the producers of goods--not services in this case--goods. If this is the description that a State uses for its utilities, yes, the committee did intend to provide exactly that protection, and that is exactly what the committee report says.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the intent of a product liability bill during a floor debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I regret to say the Senator from Massachusetts, obviously, has not read my amendment when he stated it allows 15 percent to be used for administration and not go to teachers. In fact, the distribution formula under the Gorton amendment is…
Last Friday, Oregon governor John Kitzhaber announced his support for a radical Clinton-Gore administration proposal to begin dismantling the Columbia-Snake hydroelectric system by removing four hydroelectric dams in southeastern…
I am aware. ARCO, which is well known in Alaska, recently constructed and started a 70 barrel per day Gas-to-Liquids plant in Blaine, Washington, near Bellingham. ARCO did this with its own money and that of Syntroleum. With industry…
on few occasions is this body faced with a bill that is supported by such a vast, diverse, and a broad based list of industries and organizations, such as the NAACP, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Corporate Council on Africa, and the…





